Legal Opinion

Dumartrait v. Kemper

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1876No. 902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Third Judicial District Court, parish of St. Mary. Train, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.

Plaintiff, for the use of Henry Penn and his creditors, sued the defendant on certain promissory notes, amounting in the aggregate to ninety-ñve hundred dollars, executed by defendant to the order of Henry Penn and indorsed by him.

The defense is failure of consideration caused by eviction of defendant of the principal part of the tract of land for the purchase price of which these notes were given.

The plaintiff is not a third holder before due for value. He holds *621these notes as agent ior Henry Penn, the payee, with the understanding that when collected a part of .the proceeds is to be applied…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delta Equipment and Constr. Co. v. Royal Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Penn v. PrevostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API