Legal Opinion

Bennett v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Plaintiffs notice of claim provided information sufficient to apprise defendant New York City Transit Authority of the place, time and nature of her accident in order to “investigate, collect evidence and evaluate the merit of [the] claim” (see Brown v City of New York, 95 NY2d 389, 392 [2000]). Moreover, triable issues of fact exist whether the Transit Authority had constructive notice that a continuing water condition existed on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tucker v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Loughlin v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API