Legal Opinion
Grandson v. Western Lake Superior Piping Industry Pension Plan
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 21, 2025No. 0:23-cv-00214Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA JAMES GRANDSON, Case No. 23-cv-214 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S WESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR PIPING MOTION FOR INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN; BOARD ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS OF TRUSTEES OF THE WESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR PIPING INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, Defendants. Denise Yegge Tataryn, Nolan Thompson Leighton & Tataryn PLC, Hopkins, MN, for Plaintiff. Ernest F. Peake & Stacey L. Drentlaw, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants. On January 27, 2025, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff James…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.