Legal Opinion
Neglio v. Adler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 17, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of Supreme Court, New York County (Ethel Danzig, J.), entered October 31, 1983, granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to reargue and renew, denominated therein as a motion to reargue, is modified, on the law and the facts, without costs, to direct that within 30 days from entry of the order herein, plaintiffs shall furnish to the defendants authorizations for the office records of Dr. Arthur Friedman relating to the treatment of the plaintiff Jack Neglio, and is otherwise affirmed. H In view of the conflicting information in the affidavit of Dr. Friedman, submitted in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Marine Midland Bank v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Greuling v. BreakeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Pizzo v. BunoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Centennial Restorations Co. v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Keleher v. American Airlines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Shanler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990