Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division in each case should be affirmed, with costs.

Appellants, Thomas Henry Smith, III, and Henry Cutler, were tenured teachers employed by respondents — Smith as a mathematics teacher and Cutler in elementary education. Respondents suspended them without pay, pending hearings pursuant to section 3020-a of the Education Law, because their provisional certificates expired and they failed to obtain permanent certification. Nearly 10 months after his suspension on May 21, 1981, Smith received a new provisional certificate in business…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jerry v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Amos v. Board of Education of Cheektowaga-Sloan Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Amos v. Board of Education of Cheektowaga-Sloan Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Bali v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Linton v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API