Legal Opinion · Dissent

Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. Weaver

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1975No. 74-311Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

Since I feel that the majority has unduly limited the legitimate area of protection by a covenant not to compete, I must dissent. I do not consider the distinctions made between this case and Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Murrell, 212 Ark. 449, 206 S.W. 2d 185 to afford adequate basis to justify failure to apply its principles.

The “trade secrets” or confidential information involved here is far different from that in Rector-Phillips-Morse v. Vroman, 213 Ark. 750, 489 S.W. 2d 1. There this court said that a trade secret may be defined as a secret formula, method, or device that gives one an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Grace v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. MurrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Raleigh, Inc. v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API