Musi v. Berkman
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
Defaulted for having failed to appear at a case management conference, judgment entered against the defendants in the amount of $16,712.50, which, when adjusted for double damages pursuant to G.L.c. 93A, interest, and attorney’s fees, resulted in a total judgment of $49,327.01. Only defendant Bob Blair (“Blair”) has appealed.
It is undisputed that the plaintiff, Ken Musi (“Musi”), sought in November of 2004 to have a motor boat built for him, advanced $16,712.50 in funding, and was never delivered the boat. Nondelivery led to this action being filed under the theory that the defendants had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Nancy P. v. D'AMATOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Keenan v. Maybrook, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Musi v. BlairMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Musi v. Gloucester Boat Building Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013