Legal Opinion

Musi v. Berkman

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 2, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

Defaulted for having failed to appear at a case management conference, judgment entered against the defendants in the amount of $16,712.50, which, when adjusted for double damages pursuant to G.L.c. 93A, interest, and attorney’s fees, resulted in a total judgment of $49,327.01. Only defendant Bob Blair (“Blair”) has appealed.

It is undisputed that the plaintiff, Ken Musi (“Musi”), sought in November of 2004 to have a motor boat built for him, advanced $16,712.50 in funding, and was never delivered the boat. Nondelivery led to this action being filed under the theory that the defendants had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Nancy P. v. D'AMATOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Keenan v. Maybrook, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Musi v. BlairMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  2. Musi v. Gloucester Boat Building Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API