Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Donald Cone

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 15, 2013No. 11-4888, 11-4934Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWynn, Circuit Judge

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the government’s “material alteration” theory is not supported by the plain language of the criminal trademark counterfeiting statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2820. As a result, I also agree that this Court must reverse Defendant Zhao’s conviction on Count 9, which involved a networking switch that the government concedes was manufactured by or for Cisco, and her three money laundering convictions, which were tainted by the material alteration theory. I further concur that the government adduced insufficient evidence to convict Defendant on Count 10 because…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. LightyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API