United States v. Donald Cone
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWynn, Circuit Judge
I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the government’s “material alteration” theory is not supported by the plain language of the criminal trademark counterfeiting statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2820. As a result, I also agree that this Court must reverse Defendant Zhao’s conviction on Count 9, which involved a networking switch that the government concedes was manufactured by or for Cisco, and her three money laundering convictions, which were tainted by the material alteration theory. I further concur that the government adduced insufficient evidence to convict Defendant on Count 10 because…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. LightyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.