Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1991No. 01-90-00690-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM BASS, Justice.

Appellant, Alfred Tucker, was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance. Based on enhancement paragraphs to which appellant pleaded “true,” the jury assessed punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for sixty years.

Appellant raises two points of error. First, appellant contends that the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to establish that the conviction used in the second enhancement paragraph was final. Second, appellant asserts that reversible error was committed during closing argument when the prosecutor stated that defense counsel was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Briddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Vigneault v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  2. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API