Legal Opinion
Haffel v. United States Lines Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
The defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s second amended complaint. A similar motion was previously granted on consent of the parties and the first amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file and serve the present complaint.
The plaintiff, Renee Haffel, brought this action against the defendant, United States Lines Company, to recover damages for personal injuries, which she sustained while a passenger on board the S. S. Marine Flasher in August, 1947. The Marine Flasher at the time the accident occurred, was owned by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Webber v. Herkimer & Mohawk Street RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- York v. Commodore Cruise Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Benny Chan and Victoria Chan, as Guardian Ad Litem of Samantha Chan, and Adventurer Cruises, Inc., a Liberian Corporation v. Society Expeditions, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Discoverer Reederei, Gmbh, a West German Corporation, in Personam, Benny Chan and Victoria Chan, Individually, and as Husband and Wife, Victoria Chan, as Guardian Ad Litem for Samantha Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc., a Washington Corporation, and World Discoverer, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997