Legal Opinion

Chappell Chevrolet, Inc. v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1982No. CA 81-264PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

This appeal arises from a jury award to appellee who filed a breach of contract action against appellant for its failure to deliver a 1978 Pace Car Corvette. Appellant argues that the trial judge admitted inadmissible hearsay evidence which erroneously formed the basis for the $8,590 damages awarded appellee.

The facts are undisputed. Appellee is a Chevrolet dealer in Alabama, and in 1978, he spent a great deal of his time calling Chevrolet dealers in other states in an effort to purchase 1978 Pace Car Corvettes. This model Corvette was a special limited edition and each…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louis G. Sherman, Jr., and Randolph W. Commins, Executors of the Estate of Louis G. Sherman, Sr., Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Goodin v. Farmers Tractor & Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Yelcot Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Boykin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ProctorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Poole v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Bradley v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Chappell Chevrolet, Inc. v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API