Legal Opinion

Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 5, 1996No. 95-1211Published

1Opinion of the Court

98 F.3d 644

321 U.S.App.D.C. 195

Melinda BIRT, Petitioner,

v.

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD, et al., Respondents,

Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors.

No. 95-1211.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 5, 1996.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

2Per curiam

1

Upon consideration of petitioner's Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc, the response thereto, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is

2

ORDERED by the court that the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Bartlett ex rel. Neuman v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  3. Janet Fritsch v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Monroe County, a Legal Subdivision of the State of Indiana, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. States v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API