Legal Opinion

State v. Ruiz

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1989No. 11239PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Judge.

The state contends that the district court lacked authority to order defendant confined in the county jail for his one-year sentence. We agree and reverse and remand for imposition of a correct sentence.

Defendant was convicted of battery on a peace officer and resisting arrest. Later the district court found him to be a habitual offender, with one prior conviction. The district court suspended defendant’s eighteen-month sentence for battery and his six-month sentence for resisting arrest. Pursuant to the habitual offender statute, the district court enhanced the sentence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. PedroncelliNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Brock v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. ReavesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API