Legal Opinion

Argeros & Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1982No. Appeal, No. 471 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Argeros & Company, Inc. (Argeros), a painting contractor, successfully bid on and subsequently entered into a contract with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) to paint five bridges. While painting bridge No. 4, Argeros determined that the weight of the bridge was approximately *533260 tons, as opposed to the ‘ ‘ approximately 180 tons ’ ’ listed in the bid proposal and in the contract provided by DOT, and attributed this difference to the weight of the steel deck with which the state had replaced the original wooden deck sometime after it had taken over…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. Acchioni & Canuso, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. Brayman Construction Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. Mitchell's Structural Steel Painting Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guy M. Cooper, Inc. v. East Penn School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. Mosites Construction Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Bracken Construction Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Manor Mines, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. State College Manor, Ltd. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API