Legal Opinion

Mullenix v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1993No. 90-1483PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERVIN, Chief Judge:

John J. Mullenix filed a negligence action against the United States, the State of Maryland,1 Potomac Edison Company, River-bend Membership Corporation, Falling Waters Corporation, and Donald L. Crouse to recover for personal injuries sustained when the boat in which he was riding went over Dam No. 5 on the Potomac River. On the United States’s and Potomac Edison Company’s motions for summary judgment, the district court dismissed Mulle-nix’s case as to all defendants. Mullenix appeals the dismissal of his negligence action, contending alternatively (1) that his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Morris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gary v. D. Agustini & Asociados, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
  2. In Re Brookfield Clothes, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Hurd v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  4. Briggs v. JUPITER HILLS LIGHTHOUSE MARINADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Mullenix v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API