Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mottolese v. Kaufman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 6, 1949No. 21334Published

1Dissent

FRANK, 'Circuit Judge

(dissenting).

1. As my colleagues’ opinion shows, there are now pending in the court below two stockholders’ derivative suits against the defendants, based on the same claim, and asking the same .relief, i. e., the Mottolese suit and the earlier Martini suit.1 Plaintiff moved to consolidate those two suits, but one of the defendants successfully opposed that motion. Since, however, a stay of the Mottolese suit will be academic unless the Martini suit is also stayed, I take it that my colleagues are, in effect, directing Judge Bondy to stay the Martini suit. I shall…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API