Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duncan v. Brookview House, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 20, 1974No. 19824Published

1DissentBussey, Justice

(dissenting) :

Being of the view that the judgment below should be reversed, I most respectfully dissent. To bring the issues into proper perspective, this is an action at law in which the appellants sought to recover money upon a guaranty contract, and the respondents sought, inter alia an offset against their liability, predicated upon an alleged express contract upon the part of I. Q. Anthony to purchase one-third of the authorized capital stock of Brookview House, Inc. at the par value thereof to wit: $16,666.67. The cause was referred by consent and the findings of fact by the special…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard & Foster Co. v. Citizens Nat. BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Phillips Refrigeration Co. v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API