Legal Opinion

Chicago Stamping Co. v. Mechanical Rubber Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 12, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

July 8, 1898, appellee commenced suit in assumpsit against appellant to the July term, 1898, which term commenced July l£th, and at the same time filed its declaration, consisting of the common counts, also what purported to be a copy of the account sued on, and an affidavit, as prescribed by section 36 of the practice act. S. & C. Stat., C 110, Par. 87.

July 20, 1898, the same being the third day of the term, appellant having been duly served, appeared by its attorney and moved the court for a continuance of the cause until the next term of the court, on the alleged ground that no copy of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Castle v. JudsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Cook v. ForestIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Culver v. Hide & Leather BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. McCarthey v. MooneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bauer v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  2. Farmer v. FowlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API