Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 2017No. 03-15-00620-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceMelissa Goodwin, Justice

It is well settled that the right to a speedy trial attaches when a person becomes an accused, which is when he is arrested or formally charged. Henson v. State , 407 S.W.3d 764, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) ; Cantu v. State , 253 S.W.3d 273, 280 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) ; Emery v. State , 881 S.W.2d 702, 708 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) ; Harris v. State , 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) ; see United States v. Marion , 404 U.S. 307, 320, 92 S.Ct. 455, 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971) ("[I]t is either a formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API