Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2013PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant fatally shot Livingston Powell, and was prosecuted for murder. His defense was justification. Defendant testified at trial that he panicked and shot Powell when he saw Powell reach for his waist. There was no evidence that Powell had a weapon at the time.

Under Penal Law § 35.15, defendant’s shooting of Powell could have been justified only if defendant reasonably believed *1020that Powell was “using or about to use deadly physical force” (Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]); however, even if defendant did have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. In re Robert S.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. KerleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. ParsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. TerrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API