Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Saul
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 26, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00291Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN AIMEE FISCHER Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-C-291 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Aimee Fischer applied for social security disability benefits, alleging that she could no longer work due to a variety of impairments, including fibromyalgia, hip and back pain, obesity, depression, and anxiety, but the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) assigned to the case concluded that she could still perform a range of unskilled, sedentary work. Plaintiff now seeks judicial review…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Elder v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Kathleen Briscoe, on Behalf of Nelson Taylor, Deceased v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Linda Roddy v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Hattie Dixon v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.