Legal Opinion

Hatterman v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1970No. 24235PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Groves.

The plaintiff in error was claimant under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. His claim was reopened upon his petition for additional compensation. After further hearings the Industrial Commission declined to grant further compensation to the claimant. The district court affirmed. We sustain the affirmance'.

On March 20, 1963, while in the course of his employment, the claimant was on a flat rack trailer and was struck by falling side gates, thereby causing him to be knocked to the ground. He filed a claim for compensation. On December 23,1964, he was awarded permanent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. United Utilities & Specialties Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Puncec v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Cary v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Wilson v. Colorado Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Walton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API