Legal Opinion

Dorsey Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1935No. 7630PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The Dorsey Company was held by the Board of Tax Appeals to have realized a gain in the year 1928 by a sale that year to the testamentary trustees of the estate of its recently deceased majority stockholder of a building in the city of Dallas, Tex., which housed its plant. It took a lease back on it. The depreciated cost of the building was $162,000. The consideration recited in the deed was $162,000, and was paid $62,000 in money and $100,000 in 1000 shares of stock of the corporation. The purchasers held much additional stock. The corporation had a capital of $290,000…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. WangemannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  2. Walville Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. Isaacs v. NeeceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  4. Mount v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Spear & Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Esmark, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  2. Johnson-McReynolds Chevrolet Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  3. E. R. Squibb & Sons v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. Country Club Estates, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API