Legal Opinion

People v. Horrell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2009No. 106472PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, Carman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

In the case at bar, we are asked to determine whether the trial court properly sentenced defendant to a term of probation on one count which was to commence after his release from prison on other counts. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the trial court properly sentenced defendant.

Background

Defendant, Phillip Horrell, was charged with six counts of forgery (720 ILCS 5/17 — 3(a)(1), (a)(2) (West 2004)), a Class 3 felony. Three of the counts (I, III,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KlinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Beacham v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Holly v. MontesIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. HorrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. DensonIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. NunezIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. VingaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  4. People v. KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. People v. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API