Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

James Nicholson and S. J. Tanner instituted this action in the circuit court against O. C. Hayes and Ida Bell to recover damages for the breach of a lease contract of two town, lots for the term of five years.

The defendants denied any breach of the contract on their part, and set up facts entitling them to a reformation of the contract. On their motion the case was transferred to the chancery court and tried there.

The record shows that, on the first day of January, 19'23, O. C. Hayes and Mrs. Ida Bell leased to James Nicholson and S. J. Tanner lots one and two, in block three, in the town of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Cain v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dodson v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Barton-Mansfield Company v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Exchange National Bank v. BarronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Schwarzlose v. KingreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API