Legal Opinion

United States v. Oshatz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 26, 1989No. 87 Cr. 1000 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

At issue is the propriety under Fed. R.Evid. 405(a) of a question posed during the cross-examination of a fact witness who had testified as to defendant’s honesty. The question asked the witness to assume certain facts in contention and to indicate whether such facts would alter her opinion.

Defendants Michael P. Oshatz (“Oshatz”) and Leonard A. Messinger (“Messinger”), both lawyers in the same firm, have been charged with tax fraud for allegedly generating false tax losses through various partnerships that traded fraudulently in government securities and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Eduardo BermudezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Carol BirneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Moss v. Central of Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. William C. PageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael P. Oshatz and Leonard A. MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Michael P. Oshatz and Leonard A. MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API