Paul Davis Restoration of S.E. Wisconsin, Inc. v. Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast Wisconsin

¶ 28. (concurring). The majority opinion concludes that the judgment in favor of Paul Davis Restoration of Southeast Wisconsin, Inc. (Southeast), entered as the confirmation of an arbitration award against Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast Wisconsin (Northeast) (which is a "doing business as" (d/b/a) designation employed by EA Green Bay, LLC), is enforceable in a garnishment action against an account at Denmark State Bank that is held *634in the name of EA Green Bay, Northeast and other d/b/a's of EA Green Bay.1 I agree.

¶ 29. Prior to entering the judgment confirming the arbitration award,…