Legal Opinion

Moltrup Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1967No. Appeal, 150PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

The questions involved in this appeal are many and the record is confusing. However, the two principal questions may be thus stated: (1) Did the unconsumed property which originally was part of the residuary estate of Walter J. Moltrup, husband of Mary E. Moltrup, together with the accretions thereof, belong to their son Merle as remainderman under the will of his father, or did such property belong to appellants and others, all of whom were appointees under Mrs. Moltrup’s will; and (2) is Merle’s executor estopped from asserting Merle’s claim thereto by a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Britt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Houston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Sowers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Dinkey EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Cannistra EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Estate of: McFadden, G. Appeal of: Harrison, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In Re Estate of DoerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Estate of Leggett v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Sumney EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API