Diaz v. Ellerman Bucknall S. S. Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 25, 1976, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, vacated, the third-*962party complaint reinstated, and the matter remanded for a new trial, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event. It was error to direct a verdict for defendants. The complaint asserted causes of action in both unseaworthiness and negligence. The use of the "chocks” in the manner testified to was sufficient to create an issue of fact as to the existence of an unseaworthy condition. (See Edynak v Atlantic Shipping Inc.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Albanese v. N. v. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rome Cable Corp. v. TanneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Swedish American Lines v. FerranteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
3Cited by1 opinion
- Merkle v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978