S. Siwel Co. v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
TRAYNOR, J., Dissenting.
Plaintiff brought this action to obtain a refund of special assessments paid under protest. Plaintiff’s land was in a special assessment district within the city of South Gate, established under the Acquisition and Improvement Act (Stats. 1925, p. 849; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, Act 3276(a))* for the improvement of Wright Road, a highway of general county use. The defendant city undertook the proceedings necessary to form the district and issued bonds totalling $43,400 to cover the cost of the improvement. Annual assessments were levied to cover interest and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Faitoute Iron & Steel Co. v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Smith v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Valentine v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.