Legal Opinion
Edward C. Hester v. International Union of Operating Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 20, 1987No. 85-7699PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
We have reexamined the conclusion in our previous panel opinion that “the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over all of Hester’s federal claims,” 818 F.2d 1537, 1543 (11th Cir.1987). We now offer the following clarification of this statement.
Hester’s complaint alleged that his international union, as his exclusive bargaining representative, breached its duty of fair representation by upholding the fine imposed by Local 660 despite the veterans’ preference provisions incorporated into the collective bargaining agreement. Hester asserted that the federal district court had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Parker v. Connors Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Celli v. ShoellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Robert W. Wildberger Jr. v. American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio and John N. SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Celli v. ShoellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Jose Santiago v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.