First National Bank of Jersey City v. Bard
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Four actions by the First National Bank of Jersey City against Frederick B. Bard individually, and as assignee of Clarke, Radcliffe & Co. and others, to determine the validity of certain confessed judgments in favor of the defendants Kenyon, Carter, Shepard, and Walker; all of which actions were tried together by consent. Judgment in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.
The omission to insert in the ease on appeal any statement that it contains all the evidence prevents us from considering the interesting and important points made in the argument of the appellant against those portions of the judgments which are appealed from. Porter v. Smith, 107 N. Y. 531, 14 N. E. Rep. 446. The appellant attacks the confessed judgments in favor of the several respondents on'the ground that they, together with the general assignment to the defendant Bard, constituted a single instrument, executed in pursuance of one scheme or device to withdraw the property of Clarke,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. CotzhausenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Porter v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Central Nat. Bank v. SeligmanNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Granger v. LymanSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1891
- Granger v. LymanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1891