Legal Opinion
Inner City Redevelopment Corp. v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 30, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered March 9, 2010, which, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant Thyssenkrupp has a duty to defend plaintiff in the underlying personal injury action and in addition declared that said defendant is obligated to indemnify plaintiff for up to $1.25 million, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
As defendant Thyssenkrupp is not an insurer, its duty to defend its contractual indemnitee is no broader than its duty to indemnify (Bellefleur v Newark…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bellefleur v. Newark Beth Israel Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Francescon v. Gucci America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hoverson v. Herbert Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Singh v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Luxor Capital, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- ACC Constr. Corp. v. Merchants Mut. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- ACC Constr. Corp. v. Merchants Mut. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Ezzard v. One East River Place Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Colony Insurance Company v. Southwest Marine and General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.