Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Taylor Forge & Pipe Works

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1977No. 2-577A188PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, C.J.

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from a decision of the full Industrial Board denying their applications for award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act 1 and Workmen’s Occupa tional Diseases Act. 2

The facts favorable to the Industrial Board decision show that the appellants were employed as operators of a steam hammer in defendant-appellee’s forge shop for periods of five to 20 years. Due to the nature of the work done in the plant, there was a high level of noise. Appellants complain of a permanent partial noise-induced hearing loss which occurred gradually during their lengthy employment. Their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. AlmodovarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Estey Piano Corporation v. SteffenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Ellis v. Hubbell Metals, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Durham Manufacturing Co. v. HutchinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cisneros v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Donahue v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Goins v. LottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Allied Fibers v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. Bowling v. Fountain County Highway DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API