Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Arland Decastro Abbott

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 9, 2020No. 79734-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 79734-4-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION ARLAND DECASTRO ABBOTT, Appellant. CHUN, J. — The State charged Arland Abbott with indecent liberties. Only one potential juror in his venire, and no empaneled juror, was African American. The jury found Abbott guilty as charged. Abbott appeals. To demonstrate that a jury does not represent a fair cross-section of the community, a defendant must establish that systematic exclusion led to the underrepresentation of a distinctive group. Abbott does not satisfy…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API