Legal Opinion
Keating v. University of South Dakota
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 30, 2013No. CIV 04-4208PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Docket 84. Plaintiff Christopher Keating filed two responses in opposition to the motion, and Defendants have submitted a reply brief. The summary judgment motion will be granted in part and denied in part for the reasons set forth below.
DECISION
Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that summary judgment shall be entered “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to a judgment as…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orr v. Northern State UniversityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023