Legal Opinion

Schilling v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1888No. 14,142PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellant was convicted upon a charge of having unlawfully sold intoxicating liquors without a license, to be drank in and about his house, where the same were sold. The prosecution is based upon section 5320, R. S. 1881, which provides that “ Any person, not being licensed according to the provisions of this act, who shall sell or barter, directly or indirectly, any spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time, or who shall sell or barter any'spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors to be drank, or suffered to be drank in his house, out-house, yard, garden, or the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. WigglesworthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
  2. Ford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. State of Iowa v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  4. Schlicht v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Bandalow v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Madison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Simmons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McCabe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Bienz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Blough v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API