Legal Opinion
State v. Corrales
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 14, 1976No. 2 CA-CR 734PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellant was originally convicted of sale of heroin but before sentencing the court granted his motion for a new trial. The second trial ended in a mistrial on June 13, 1975. A third trial was scheduled for August 7, 1975. On July 23, the prosecutor moved for a continuance because he would be on vacation August 7. The trial was postponed until August 18, 1975. Appellant was again convicted of sale of heroin. Appellant now contends that it was error to grant the continuance to the state.
Rule 8.2(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., requires the new trial to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. CassiusArizona Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Neely v. SherrillArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State v. HeiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.