Legal Opinion

McCaffrey v. Halsey Stuart & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The action is to recover damages arising from fraud in the sale of certain bonds. Appeal is by certain of the defendants from the order that denies their motions (1) under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; or, in the alternative, (2) under rule 90 to compel the plaintiff to state separately and number the causes of action, (3) under rule 102, to require that the complaint be made more definite and certain, and (4) under rule 103 to strike out paragraphs 15, 16, 17,18 and 19 of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. E. Sonnenschein & Co. v. Roberts Companies of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API