Legal Opinion
Franco v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided February 13, 2006No. 1334, C.A. 1:04-23187PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
REMAND ORDER
WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.
This matter is before the Panel on defendants’ 1 motions, pursuant to Rule 7.6, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 436-38 (2001), to vacate the Panel’s order conditionally remanding this action (Franco) to the District of New Jersey. The Franco plaintiffs oppose the motions to vacate and favor remand of Franco to the District of New Jersey.
On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that remand of Franco is appropriate at this time. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the Panel is obligated to remand a transferred action, like the one at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jennifer N. Kocher Darlene Kocher Carl Kocher v. Dow Chemical Company E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Holiday Magic Securities & Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- Hillman v. WebleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Involving Air Crash Disaster Near Dayton, Ohio, on March 9, 1967United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Managed Care LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006