United States v. Walter Deland Triplett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Walter Deland Triplett appeals from the order of the district court overruling his motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea. Defendant argues that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to grant his motion to withdraw and by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court.
I
On May 30, 1985, defendant Triplett was indicted by information for unarmed bank robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Shortly thereafter, defense counsel Slaybod filed a motion to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Howard E. SaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Marvin GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Gregory Angelo SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Nidal Bazzi (95-1435), Robert Michael Kelly (95-1505)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Maximiliano BaezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.