Legal Opinion

ROYSTER v. MAHALLY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02126Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TELLY ROYSTER, : : Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-2126 : v. : : LAWRENCE MAHALLY; THE : DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE : COUNTY OF PHILA.; and THE : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE : OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondents. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Smith, J. December 14, 2022 The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act provides for a one-year statute of limitations for the filing of habeas petitions. Generally, this limitations period runs from the date the habeas petitioner’s judgment of sentence becomes final; however, AEDPA…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API