State ex rel. Wertz v. Horn
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hopkins, J.:
This controversy involves an interpretation of section 9 of chapter 255 of the Laws of 1927, which provides for reimbursement to the taxpayers of funds paid by them for the construction of hard-surfaced roads in benefit districts when such funds *592have been collected and are available for such reimbursement purposes. The pertinent part of section 9 reads:
“The board of county commissioners in any county in which state highways have been built . . . shall . . . when such fund is not necessary to construct a state highway in accordance with some…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tatlow v. BaconSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Coney v. Mayor of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Van Doren v. WolfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Pfleiderer v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- City of Independence v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hunziker v. School District No. 26Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- State ex rel. Day v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Russell v. CogswellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940