Legal Opinion

Sueske v. Schofield

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 19, 1940No. Gen. No. 41,144PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hebel

The defendant, Frank Schofield, as executor and trustee under the last will and testament of Elmer F. Sueske, deceased, appealed to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the consideration of testator’s will involved a freehold. The Supreme Court, however, in consideration of the matter, held that the case was one that did not involve a freehold, and transferred the case to this court for the purpose of considering the matters that are called to the attention of the Appellate Court by the several briefs filed.

The plaintiffs in this case filed their complaint in chancery in the circuit court of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Howe v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Blatchford v. NewberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Riddle v. KillianIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Franklin v. HastingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sherman v. FlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kane v. SchofieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API