Legal Opinion

Crabb v. Wilkinson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1947No. 36570Published

1Opinion

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR.

The suggestion of error raises the point that subsequent to the final decree under the original bill, part of the property involved was sold by J.H. Wilkinson and Wife to certain grantees. Code 1942, Section 1392. It is now for the first time argued that our judgment should not encompass these grantees, at least one of whom purchased part of the lands after such decree and prior to the petition of defendants for rehearing.

The contention was not assigned, presented or argued upon the appeal. H.E. Wilkinson and Wife, grantees in one of such deeds, were parties to the suit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Suddoth v. TannMississippi Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API