Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Britton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 1989No. 20310-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

539 So.2d 962 (1989)

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Donald BRITTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20310-CA.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

February 22, 1989.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1989.

Donald Britton, Calhoun, pro. per.

Malcolm Decelle, Jr., Monroe, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HALL, MARVIN and SEXTON, JJ.

MARVIN, Judge.

In this action on open account, defendant Donald Britton, who appeared in proper person here and below, was held in contempt of court for statements he made to the trial judge after the judge granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The sole…

Also in this document: Dissent · Hightower; Per curiam; Dissent · Hightower.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re MilkovichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. City of Monroe v. EvansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Brown v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Dean v. DeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeGruy v. DeGruyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Stiltner v. StiltnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Meek v. MeekLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. St. Germain v. BreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API