Legal Opinion

United Timber & Lumber Co. v. Alleged Dependents of Hill

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1956No. 39890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.

The opinion in Hill v. United Timber & Lumber Company, 68 So. 2d 420, is referred to for a statement of the facts developed in this case up to that time. Pursuant to the opinion in Hill v. United Timber & Lumber Company, 73 So. 2d 247, the case was remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Commission as therein provided.

On the hearing on remand, it was stipulated by all parties that the matter be heard on the record as it existed in the Supreme Court (Hill v. United, etc., 68 So. 2d 420), together with all stipulations forming a part thereof, briefs and other papers filed therewith, and with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pathfinder Coach Division of Superior Coach Corp. v. CottrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hill v. United Timber & Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Huff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ridley v. ComptonMississippi Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co. v. FranksMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Last Will & Testament of Case v. CaseMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ladnier v. Ladnier's EstateMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Boen's Dependents v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API