Pritchard v. Cavanaugh

OPINION

By KLINGER, J.

Under the law, as defined in Ohio, the defendant in this action had the right of way. Both under §§,6310-28a and 6310-28 GC, it was the duty of the driver of the automobile in which the plaintiff was a passenger to look to his right as he approached State Highway No. 17, and it was his duty to see the approaching automobile, since it is undisputed that the automobile was on the highway and that it was approaching in the direction of the crossing, and his failure to see it is no excuse.

The defendant in this case had a right to expect those using highway No. 45 would…