Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Tremaine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2005No. 101 DB 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of *1165the Disciplinary Board dated November 22, 2005, are approved and it is ORDERED that DEGAS GRANDVIL TRE-MAINE, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edmond v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API