Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Hardy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1990No. 893SC678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This appeal raises the single question of whether an insurer is liable for prejudgment interest when such payment would result in a total amount that exceeds the stated policy limits. Plaintiffs argue that USF&G’s liability is not limited to the policy limits since the policy conflicts with G.S. § 24-5. We disagree.

Initially, we recognize that an offer of judgment was made by defendants and that a settlement for the full $50,000 policy limit was reached by the parties. We also recognize that this settlement amounted to a release of claims, not a judgment. The issue of USF&G’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Hobson Construction Co. v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Penley v. PenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Barnes v. HardyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Collins v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Collins v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API